In article <20031020210640.00663.00000934 RemoveThis @mb-m04.aol.com>,
europa2846 RemoveThis @aol.com (Europa2846) wrote:
> There's no sense the Bucks are unhappy with Kukoc. On the contrary, they
> were quite pleased with him last season. But with a $9 million contract
> coming
> off the books at the end of the season, he stands to be a very attractive
> trading commodity. If the Bucks were able to get a No. 1 pick and a young
> prospect for Kukoc, that could be a very sweet deal.
OK, thanks. I knew they were happy with him last year so that's why I
was puzzled he was being shopped this early in the season. I could
certainly understand unloading him in February if the compensation is
attractive enough, but I would think they'd want his "veteran presence"
for at least the early part of the season since the team is so young. I
think the Bucks would want him on the court (offensively) at the end of
close games, at least early on. I know his game has flaws, but I still
think he's an asset to the Bucks.
SubSonic
--
To send email, remove "no_spam" and "invalid" from the address shown above
>> Stay informed about: ESPN Insider: Bucks Shopping Kukoc