Welcome to BasketballFreaks.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

Fouls disparities in Finals.

 
Goto page 1, 2
   Your Basketball Community (Home) -> Boston Celtics RSS
Next:  Boston Celtics: JR Giddens article  
Author Message
Ego

External


Since: Mar 21, 2008
Posts: 282



(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:32 am
Post subject: Fouls disparities in Finals.
Archived from groups: alt>sports>basketball>nba>boston-celtics, others (more info?)

some lakers bitches were whining about the foul disparities.
so I checked it up.

thoughout the series, Boston commited 150 fouls, lakers 160.

or 25 fouls / game by Boston
and 26.6 fouls / game by LA.

it's surprising to me, I mean Celtics were obviously the aggressors,
constantly taking it to the hoop and all those, and on the lakers team, u
have bunch of softies,
kobe shoots mostly from mid-range, gasol is afraid of physical contacts,
odom is another softie,
walton, sasha, farmar, radmonovic, all typical euro-softies.

if the refs were rigging, obviously they were tilted towards the lakers, cuz
the way both teams were playing
the foul disparities should be avg, 33 to 26 or something.

 >> Stay informed about: Fouls disparities in Finals. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Raymond O'Hara

External


Since: May 29, 2008
Posts: 98



(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:52 am
Post subject: Re: Fouls disparities in Finals. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Ego" <d.TakeThisOut@d.com> wrote in message news:JI09k.53708$gc5.14362@pd7urf2no...
> some lakers bitches were whining about the foul disparities.
> so I checked it up.
>
> thoughout the series, Boston commited 150 fouls, lakers 160.
>
> or 25 fouls / game by Boston
> and 26.6 fouls / game by LA.
>
> it's surprising to me, I mean Celtics were obviously the aggressors,
> constantly taking it to the hoop and all those, and on the lakers team, u
> have bunch of softies,
> kobe shoots mostly from mid-range, gasol is afraid of physical contacts,
> odom is another softie,
> walton, sasha, farmar, radmonovic, all typical euro-softies.
>
> if the refs were rigging, obviously they were tilted towards the lakers,
> cuz the way both teams were playing
> the foul disparities should be avg, 33 to 26 or something.
>

the faker foul troubles were lower because they stopped playing defense and
never got close enough to foul.

 >> Stay informed about: Fouls disparities in Finals. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Robert Chin

External


Since: Jun 11, 2004
Posts: 1029



(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:06 am
Post subject: Re: Fouls disparities in Finals. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Raymond O'Hara" <raymond-ohara.RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ErWdnSgZ7esIbfnVnZ2dnUVZ_r_inZ2d@rcn.net...
>
>
> the faker foul troubles were lower because they stopped playing defense
> and never got close enough to foul.

THATWAS TRUE IN AT LEAST 4 GAMES. <SNICKER>
 >> Stay informed about: Fouls disparities in Finals. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ego

External


Since: Mar 21, 2008
Posts: 282



(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Fouls disparities in Finals. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

the refs handed gm 5 to the lakers gift-wrapped.
paul pierce was foul by kobe and should have got 2 FTs to tie the game,
instead a non-call and fast-break dunk on the other end resulted in a 4pts
swing.

rigged!!

"Robert Chin" <bchin_us DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:g42s6l0ip7@news4.newsguy.com...
> "Raymond O'Hara" <raymond-ohara DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ErWdnSgZ7esIbfnVnZ2dnUVZ_r_inZ2d@rcn.net...
>>
>>
>> the faker foul troubles were lower because they stopped playing defense
>> and never got close enough to foul.
>
> THATWAS TRUE IN AT LEAST 4 GAMES. <SNICKER>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Fouls disparities in Finals. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Robert Chin

External


Since: Jun 11, 2004
Posts: 1029



(Msg. 5) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Fouls disparities in Finals. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Ego" <d RemoveThis @d.com> wrote in message news:Sz89k.32566$Jx.31094@pd7urf1no...
> the refs handed gm 5 to the lakers gift-wrapped.
> paul pierce was foul by kobe and should have got 2 FTs to tie the game,
> instead a non-call and fast-break dunk on the other end resulted in a 4pts
> swing.

Don't forget the Game 3 debacle in which the refs totally jobbed the C's
because of the incessant whining of Kobitch and Coach ZenHippyDippyDooPile.
 >> Stay informed about: Fouls disparities in Finals. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Raymond O'Hara

External


Since: May 29, 2008
Posts: 98



(Msg. 6) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Fouls disparities in Finals. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Ego" <d.TakeThisOut@d.com> wrote in message news:Sz89k.32566$Jx.31094@pd7urf1no...
> the refs handed gm 5 to the lakers gift-wrapped.
> paul pierce was foul by kobe and should have got 2 FTs to tie the game,
> instead a non-call and fast-break dunk on the other end resulted in a 4pts
> swing.
>
> rigged!!

if the roles were reversed we would think differently.
PP was napping.
 >> Stay informed about: Fouls disparities in Finals. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Bryant Durrell

External


Since: Aug 14, 2004
Posts: 321



(Msg. 7) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Fouls disparities in Finals. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In article <6Zudnc0JobgA3_jVnZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d.TakeThisOut@rcn.net>,
Raymond O'Hara <raymond-ohara.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Ego" <d.TakeThisOut@d.com> wrote in message news:Sz89k.32566$Jx.31094@pd7urf1no...
>> the refs handed gm 5 to the lakers gift-wrapped.
>> paul pierce was foul by kobe and should have got 2 FTs to tie the game,
>> instead a non-call and fast-break dunk on the other end resulted in a 4pts
>> swing.
>>
>> rigged!!
>
> if the roles were reversed we would think differently.
>PP was napping.

I'd say Kobe gambled and got lucky. It was a pretty good play on his
part; Pierce was about to blow by him and score. 95% of the players
in the league wouldn't have gotten lucky on that gamble, either.

Matters very little now.

--
Bryant Durrell // durrell.TakeThisOut@innocence.com // durrell.TakeThisOut@gmail.com
 >> Stay informed about: Fouls disparities in Finals. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ego

External


Since: Mar 21, 2008
Posts: 282



(Msg. 8) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:19 pm
Post subject: Re: Fouls disparities in Finals. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

lakers should return the 2002 championship rings to the Kings..


"Robert Chin" <bchin_us.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:g438qu02d2h@news5.newsguy.com...
> "Ego" <d.DeleteThis@d.com> wrote in message news:Sz89k.32566$Jx.31094@pd7urf1no...
>> the refs handed gm 5 to the lakers gift-wrapped.
>> paul pierce was foul by kobe and should have got 2 FTs to tie the game,
>> instead a non-call and fast-break dunk on the other end resulted in a
>> 4pts swing.
>
> Don't forget the Game 3 debacle in which the refs totally jobbed the C's
> because of the incessant whining of Kobitch and Coach
> ZenHippyDippyDooPile.
>
 >> Stay informed about: Fouls disparities in Finals. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ego

External


Since: Mar 21, 2008
Posts: 282



(Msg. 9) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Fouls disparities in Finals. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

watch the replay.
he got all arms..

lucky? or rigged?


"Bryant Durrell" <durrell DeleteThis @innocence.com> wrote in message
news:NPqdnUBd_Jw40vjVnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@supernews.com...
> In article <6Zudnc0JobgA3_jVnZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d DeleteThis @rcn.net>,
> Raymond O'Hara <raymond-ohara DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>"Ego" <d DeleteThis @d.com> wrote in message news:Sz89k.32566$Jx.31094@pd7urf1no...
>>> the refs handed gm 5 to the lakers gift-wrapped.
>>> paul pierce was foul by kobe and should have got 2 FTs to tie the game,
>>> instead a non-call and fast-break dunk on the other end resulted in a
>>> 4pts
>>> swing.
>>>
>>> rigged!!
>>
>> if the roles were reversed we would think differently.
>>PP was napping.
>
> I'd say Kobe gambled and got lucky. It was a pretty good play on his
> part; Pierce was about to blow by him and score. 95% of the players
> in the league wouldn't have gotten lucky on that gamble, either.
>
> Matters very little now.
>
> --
> Bryant Durrell // durrell DeleteThis @innocence.com // durrell DeleteThis @gmail.com
 >> Stay informed about: Fouls disparities in Finals. 
Back to top
Login to vote
big normy

External


Since: Jun 19, 2008
Posts: 7



(Msg. 10) Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 1:40 am
Post subject: Re: Fouls disparities in Finals. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Ego" <d.TakeThisOut@d.com> wrote in news:Nic9k.32757$Jx.1185@pd7urf1no:

> watch the replay.
> he got all arms..


Kobe's reach-around has been a dirty play that he's used for 10 years
whenever anyone drives past him; it's a reach in foul every time.

--
"Call me Big Normy when you back that azz up." - Norm
 >> Stay informed about: Fouls disparities in Finals. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Ego

External


Since: Mar 21, 2008
Posts: 282



(Msg. 11) Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 2:43 am
Post subject: Re: Fouls disparities in Finals. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

thank you!


"big normy" <normoline RemoveThis @yahoo.com.normspants> wrote in message
news:Xns9ACADCA73A17Fbignormy@207.115.17.102...
> "Ego" <d RemoveThis @d.com> wrote in news:Nic9k.32757$Jx.1185@pd7urf1no:
>
>> watch the replay.
>> he got all arms..
>
>
> Kobe's reach-around has been a dirty play that he's used for 10 years
> whenever anyone drives past him; it's a reach in foul every time.
>
> --
> "Call me Big Normy when you back that azz up." - Norm
 >> Stay informed about: Fouls disparities in Finals. 
Back to top
Login to vote
VicXnews

External


Since: Aug 26, 2004
Posts: 2571



(Msg. 12) Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 4:05 am
Post subject: Re: Fouls disparities in Finals. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

big normy <normoline.DeleteThis@yahoo.com.normspants> wrote in
news:Xns9ACADCA73A17Fbignormy@207.115.17.102:

> "Ego" <d.DeleteThis@d.com> wrote in news:Nic9k.32757$Jx.1185@pd7urf1no:
>
>> watch the replay.
>> he got all arms..
>
>
> Kobe's reach-around has been a dirty play that he's used for 10 years
> whenever anyone drives past him; it's a reach in foul every time.
>

plain pure bullshit...
 >> Stay informed about: Fouls disparities in Finals. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Gary Collard

External


Since: Apr 08, 2008
Posts: 891



(Msg. 13) Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Fouls disparities in Finals. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Raymond O'Hara wrote:
> "Ego" <d DeleteThis @d.com> wrote in message news:JI09k.53708$gc5.14362@pd7urf2no...
>> some lakers bitches were whining about the foul disparities.
>> so I checked it up.
>>
>> thoughout the series, Boston commited 150 fouls, lakers 160.
>>
>> or 25 fouls / game by Boston
>> and 26.6 fouls / game by LA.
>>
>> it's surprising to me, I mean Celtics were obviously the aggressors,
>> constantly taking it to the hoop and all those, and on the lakers team, u
>> have bunch of softies,
>> kobe shoots mostly from mid-range, gasol is afraid of physical contacts,
>> odom is another softie,
>> walton, sasha, farmar, radmonovic, all typical euro-softies.
>>
>> if the refs were rigging, obviously they were tilted towards the lakers,
>> cuz the way both teams were playing
>> the foul disparities should be avg, 33 to 26 or something.
>>
>
> the faker foul troubles were lower because they stopped playing defense and
> never got close enough to foul.

What a stupid thing to say - foul trouble caused by defenders not getting
close to offensive players. Got to love a guy that refutes his own point
in the course of a single sentence :)

Raymond unwittingly claims that the Lakers got hosed.

--
Gary Collard
SABR-L Moderator
gmcollard DeleteThis @yahoo.com
http://sarcastipundit.blogspot.com/

"A wheelchair? Seriously? ... We’ve dinged our knee up harder on
our computer desk." -- The Big Lead on Paul Pierce
 >> Stay informed about: Fouls disparities in Finals. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Gary Collard

External


Since: Apr 08, 2008
Posts: 891



(Msg. 14) Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Fouls disparities in Finals. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

big normy wrote:
> "Ego" <d.DeleteThis@d.com> wrote in news:Nic9k.32757$Jx.1185@pd7urf1no:
>
>> watch the replay.
>> he got all arms..
>
>
> Kobe's reach-around has been a dirty play that he's used for 10 years
> whenever anyone drives past him; it's a reach in foul every time.

Stripping the ball is dirty? Damn, you must have seen Rondo in game 6 as
one of the dirtiest players ever.

--
Gary Collard
SABR-L Moderator
gmcollard.DeleteThis@yahoo.com
http://sarcastipundit.blogspot.com/

"A wheelchair? Seriously? ... We’ve dinged our knee up harder on
our computer desk." -- The Big Lead on Paul Pierce
 >> Stay informed about: Fouls disparities in Finals. 
Back to top
Login to vote
brink

External


Since: Nov 04, 2007
Posts: 1316



(Msg. 15) Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:15 pm
Post subject: Re: Fouls disparities in Finals. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"big normy" <normoline DeleteThis @yahoo.com.normspants> wrote in message
news:Xns9ACADCA73A17Fbignormy@207.115.17.102...
> "Ego" <d DeleteThis @d.com> wrote in news:Nic9k.32757$Jx.1185@pd7urf1no:
>
>> watch the replay.
>> he got all arms..
>
>
> Kobe's reach-around has been a dirty play that he's used for 10 years
> whenever anyone drives past him; it's a reach in foul every time.

We defer to your abundant firsthand experience with reacharounds.

brink
 >> Stay informed about: Fouls disparities in Finals. 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Your Basketball Community (Home) -> Boston Celtics All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page 1, 2
Page 1 of 2

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]