 |
|
 |
|
Next: Money results - slight correction
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Sep 26, 2006 Posts: 128
|
(Msg. 16) Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 10:06 pm
Post subject: Re: GSD already? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: rec>sport>basketball>college (more info?)
|
|
|
"Milt Epstein" <mepstein.DeleteThis@uiuc.edu> wrote
> >> >> Good lord, is that a mirage? I *thought* I saw a post in RSBC....
> >> >
> >> >Watch out for dust devils. And the monotonous droll of a
> >> >baseball game can be like strobelights to a schitzophreniac.
> >>
> >> Speak for yourselves. The Mets are good again, finally, and hopefully
> >> they'll help me get through most, if not all, of the desert.
> >
> >Crikey!! A Mets fan in Champaign. Who knew?
>
> I know of at least one other one. Well, I should say "knew". Maybe
> he is sleeping with the fish of lake Michigan.
--Tedward >> Stay informed about: GSD already? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 26, 2006 Posts: 128
|
(Msg. 17) Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 10:06 pm
Post subject: Re: GSD already? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Edward M. Kennedy" <doidy.TakeThisOut@wox.com> wrote
> > >> >> Good lord, is that a mirage? I *thought* I saw a post in RSBC....
> > >> >
> > >> >Watch out for dust devils. And the monotonous droll of a
> > >> >baseball game can be like strobelights to a schitzophreniac.
> > >>
> > >> Speak for yourselves. The Mets are good again, finally, and hopefully
> > >> they'll help me get through most, if not all, of the desert.
> > >
> > >Crikey!! A Mets fan in Champaign. Who knew?
> >
> > I know of at least one other one. Well, I should say "knew". Maybe
> > he is sleeping with the fish of lake Michigan.
>
> IFYPFY
IFMPFM.
--Tedward >> Stay informed about: GSD already? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 08, 2004 Posts: 23
|
(Msg. 18) Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 10:11 pm
Post subject: Re: GSD already? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Geoffrey F. Green" <geoff-usenet2 RemoveThis @stuebegreen.com> writes:
>In article <slrnf1ao45.nhe.djbSPAMSUCKS RemoveThis @gomer.donniebarnes.com>,
> Donnie Barnes <djbSPAMSUCKS RemoveThis @donniebarnes.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 05 Apr, Milt Epstein wrote:
>> > Speak for yourselves. The Mets are good again, finally, and
>> > hopefully they'll help me get through most, if not all, of the
>> > desert.
>>
>> Haven't Mets fans been saying that at the beginning of the last few
>> seasons? How's that working out for you?
>
>Ummmm, far be it for me to bring facts into this discussion, but the
>Mets did lead the NL with 97 wins last year
Led the majors actually (OK, tied).
> and lost in Game 7 of the
>NLCS. That, to me, qualifies as "good."
In the bottom of the ninth, no less. Arrrggghhh!
--
Milt Epstein
mepstein RemoveThis @uiuc.edu >> Stay informed about: GSD already? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 17, 2007 Posts: 36
|
(Msg. 19) Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 1:03 am
Post subject: Re: GSD already? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 05 Apr, Milt Epstein wrote:
> "Geoffrey F. Green" <geoff-usenet2.TakeThisOut@stuebegreen.com> writes:
>
>>In article <slrnf1ao45.nhe.djbSPAMSUCKS.TakeThisOut@gomer.donniebarnes.com>,
>> Donnie Barnes <djbSPAMSUCKS.TakeThisOut@donniebarnes.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 05 Apr, Milt Epstein wrote:
>>> > Speak for yourselves. The Mets are good again, finally, and
>>> > hopefully they'll help me get through most, if not all, of the
>>> > desert.
>>>
>>> Haven't Mets fans been saying that at the beginning of the last few
>>> seasons? How's that working out for you?
>>
>>Ummmm, far be it for me to bring facts into this discussion, but the
>>Mets did lead the NL with 97 wins last year
He said "finally" as if they were even better or something. *shrug*
> Led the majors actually (OK, tied).
>
>> and lost in Game 7 of the
>>NLCS. That, to me, qualifies as "good."
>
> In the bottom of the ninth, no less. Arrrggghhh!
Still lost. :P
--Donnie
--
Donnie Barnes http://www.donniebarnes.com 879. V. >> Stay informed about: GSD already? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 10, 2007 Posts: 49
|
(Msg. 20) Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 5:25 am
Post subject: Re: GSD already? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 2007-04-05, foaddoc <foad.TakeThisOut@yourearliestconvenience.com> wrote:
>
> "Edward M. Kennedy" <doidy.TakeThisOut@wox.com> wrote in message
> news:ev3r7i$dvl$1@gargoyle.oit.duke.edu...
>
>> Great for me, but I'm a Yankees fan.
>
> Dewk and the Yankees? Did you root for Stalin to win the cold war as well?
>
No, he rooted for the U.S. We were the overdogs in that contest....
--
Being against torture ought to be sort of a bipartisan thing.
-- Karl Lehenbauer >> Stay informed about: GSD already? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 10, 2007 Posts: 49
|
(Msg. 21) Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 5:28 am
Post subject: Re: GSD already? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 2007-04-05, jsh <hughes.DeleteThis@uiuc.edu> wrote:
> In article <ev35o4$hcj$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu>,
> Milt Epstein <mepstein.DeleteThis@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>
>> "Edward M. Kennedy" <doidy.DeleteThis@wox.com> writes:
>>
>> >"Constance Reeder" <constance.DeleteThis@duxmail.com> wrote
>> >
>> >> Good lord, is that a mirage? I *thought* I saw a post in RSBC....
>> >
>> >Watch out for dust devils. And the monotonous droll of a
>> >baseball game can be like strobelights to a schitzophreniac.
>>
>> Speak for yourselves. The Mets are good again, finally, and hopefully
>> they'll help me get through most, if not all, of the desert.
>
> Crikey!! A Mets fan in Champaign. Who knew?
One of the few places in the U.S. with significant fandoms for three
baseball teams....45% redbirds, 45% cubbies, 10% pale hose.
--
Being against torture ought to be sort of a bipartisan thing.
-- Karl Lehenbauer >> Stay informed about: GSD already? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 26, 2006 Posts: 128
|
(Msg. 22) Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 10:06 am
Post subject: Re: GSD already? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"foaddoc" <foad.DeleteThis@yourearliestconvenience.com> wrote
> > Great for me, but I'm a Yankees fan.
>
> Dewk and the Yankees? Did you root for Stalin to win the cold war as well?
I rooted yo mamma and then gave her a high protein
tonsil wash.
--Tedward >> Stay informed about: GSD already? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 06, 2007 Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 23) Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 3:23 pm
Post subject: Re: GSD already? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <slrnf1b6tl.od4.djbSPAMSUCKS DeleteThis @gomer.donniebarnes.com>,
Donnie Barnes <djbSPAMSUCKS DeleteThis @donniebarnes.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr, Milt Epstein wrote:
> > "Geoffrey F. Green" <geoff-usenet2 DeleteThis @stuebegreen.com> writes:
> >
> >>In article <slrnf1ao45.nhe.djbSPAMSUCKS DeleteThis @gomer.donniebarnes.com>,
> >> Donnie Barnes <djbSPAMSUCKS DeleteThis @donniebarnes.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, 05 Apr, Milt Epstein wrote:
> >>> > Speak for yourselves. The Mets are good again, finally, and
> >>> > hopefully they'll help me get through most, if not all, of the
> >>> > desert.
> >>>
> >>> Haven't Mets fans been saying that at the beginning of the last few
> >>> seasons? How's that working out for you?
> >>
> >>Ummmm, far be it for me to bring facts into this discussion, but the
> >>Mets did lead the NL with 97 wins last year
>
> He said "finally" as if they were even better or something. *shrug*
>
> > Led the majors actually (OK, tied).
> >
> >> and lost in Game 7 of the
> >>NLCS. That, to me, qualifies as "good."
> >
> > In the bottom of the ninth, no less. Arrrggghhh!
>
> Still lost. :P
>
>
> --Donnie
Go, Cards! >> Stay informed about: GSD already? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 26, 2005 Posts: 9
|
(Msg. 24) Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 5:20 pm
Post subject: Re: Ford to UK! (was Re: GSD already?) [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 14:56:22 -0400, mimus <tinmimus99.DeleteThis@hotmail.com>
wrote:
:Even though he doesn't have the track record, I think Travis Ford should
:be the leading candidate now that Donovan's outa the mix.
:
:It might well end up Dougherty-UNC all over again,
Hey, that's reason enough!
--
I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV!
George W. Harris For actual email address, replace each 'u' with an 'i' >> Stay informed about: GSD already? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 08, 2004 Posts: 23
|
(Msg. 25) Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:11 pm
Post subject: Re: GSD already? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Cris <cris.DeleteThis@noinfo.com> writes:
>In article <slrnf1b6tl.od4.djbSPAMSUCKS.DeleteThis@gomer.donniebarnes.com>,
> Donnie Barnes <djbSPAMSUCKS.DeleteThis@donniebarnes.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 05 Apr, Milt Epstein wrote:
>> > "Geoffrey F. Green" <geoff-usenet2.DeleteThis@stuebegreen.com> writes:
>> >
>> >>In article <slrnf1ao45.nhe.djbSPAMSUCKS.DeleteThis@gomer.donniebarnes.com>,
>> >> Donnie Barnes <djbSPAMSUCKS.DeleteThis@donniebarnes.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Thu, 05 Apr, Milt Epstein wrote:
>> >>> > Speak for yourselves. The Mets are good again, finally, and
>> >>> > hopefully they'll help me get through most, if not all, of the
>> >>> > desert.
>> >>>
>> >>> Haven't Mets fans been saying that at the beginning of the last few
>> >>> seasons? How's that working out for you?
>> >>
>> >>Ummmm, far be it for me to bring facts into this discussion, but the
>> >>Mets did lead the NL with 97 wins last year
>>
>> He said "finally" as if they were even better or something. *shrug*
>>
>> > Led the majors actually (OK, tied).
>> >
>> >> and lost in Game 7 of the
>> >>NLCS. That, to me, qualifies as "good."
>> >
>> > In the bottom of the ninth, no less. Arrrggghhh!
>>
>> Still lost. :P
>>
>> --Donnie
>
>Go, Cards!
Sweep! 3-0! 20-2!
(As if that makes up for last year, grumble, grumble.)
--
Milt Epstein
mepstein.DeleteThis@uiuc.edu >> Stay informed about: GSD already? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 06, 2007 Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 26) Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 9:22 am
Post subject: Re: GSD already? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <ev6k3l$vnf$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu>,
Milt Epstein <mepstein RemoveThis @uiuc.edu> wrote:
> Cris <cris RemoveThis @noinfo.com> writes:
>
> >In article <slrnf1b6tl.od4.djbSPAMSUCKS RemoveThis @gomer.donniebarnes.com>,
> > Donnie Barnes <djbSPAMSUCKS RemoveThis @donniebarnes.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 05 Apr, Milt Epstein wrote:
> >> > "Geoffrey F. Green" <geoff-usenet2 RemoveThis @stuebegreen.com> writes:
> >> >
> >> >>In article <slrnf1ao45.nhe.djbSPAMSUCKS RemoveThis @gomer.donniebarnes.com>,
> >> >> Donnie Barnes <djbSPAMSUCKS RemoveThis @donniebarnes.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> On Thu, 05 Apr, Milt Epstein wrote:
> >> >>> > Speak for yourselves. The Mets are good again, finally, and
> >> >>> > hopefully they'll help me get through most, if not all, of the
> >> >>> > desert.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Haven't Mets fans been saying that at the beginning of the last few
> >> >>> seasons? How's that working out for you?
> >> >>
> >> >>Ummmm, far be it for me to bring facts into this discussion, but the
> >> >>Mets did lead the NL with 97 wins last year
> >>
> >> He said "finally" as if they were even better or something. *shrug*
> >>
> >> > Led the majors actually (OK, tied).
> >> >
> >> >> and lost in Game 7 of the
> >> >>NLCS. That, to me, qualifies as "good."
> >> >
> >> > In the bottom of the ninth, no less. Arrrggghhh!
> >>
> >> Still lost. :P
> >>
> >> --Donnie
> >
> >Go, Cards!
>
> Sweep! 3-0! 20-2!
>
> (As if that makes up for last year, grumble, grumble.)
Uh, no. Keep doing that all summer and it will, though.
8-) >> Stay informed about: GSD already? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 08, 2004 Posts: 23
|
(Msg. 27) Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:37 pm
Post subject: Re: GSD already? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Edward M. Kennedy" <doidy.RemoveThis@wox.com> writes:
>"Donnie Barnes" <djbSPAMSUCKS.RemoveThis@donniebarnes.com> wrote
>
>> > Speak for yourselves. The Mets are good again, finally, and
>> > hopefully they'll help me get through most, if not all, of the
>> > desert.
>>
>> Haven't Mets fans been saying that at the beginning of the last few
>> seasons? How's that working out for you?
>
>Great for me, but I'm a Yankees fan. I hate the Mets, but just
>because I root for the Yankees doesn't mean watching a baseball
>closely isn't like strobe lights to an Episcopalian.
Maybe if you cut back on the gin a bit you'd be able to appreciate it
more.
--
Milt Epstein
mepstein.RemoveThis@uiuc.edu >> Stay informed about: GSD already? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 04, 2005 Posts: 66
|
(Msg. 28) Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 3:37 pm
Post subject: Re: GSD already? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:37:19 +0000, Milt Epstein wrote:
> "Edward M. Kennedy" <doidy.DeleteThis@wox.com> writes:
>
>>"Donnie Barnes" <djbSPAMSUCKS.DeleteThis@donniebarnes.com> wrote
>>
>>> > Speak for yourselves. The Mets are good again, finally, and
>>> > hopefully they'll help me get through most, if not all, of the
>>> > desert.
>>>
>>> Haven't Mets fans been saying that at the beginning of the last few
>>> seasons? How's that working out for you?
>>
>>Great for me, but I'm a Yankees fan. I hate the Mets, but just
>>because I root for the Yankees doesn't mean watching a baseball
>>closely isn't like strobe lights to an Episcopalian.
>
> Maybe if you cut back on the gin a bit you'd be able to appreciate it
> more.
Rather the reverse.
--
The Usenet voice of the Kentucky Wildcats!
(Please ignore.)
_Raw Recruits_ and _Undue Process_ for all,
Welcome to college basketball! >> Stay informed about: GSD already? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 26, 2005 Posts: 9
|
(Msg. 29) Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 8:03 pm
Post subject: Re: GSD already? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 15:37:19 +0000 (UTC), Milt Epstein
<mepstein.TakeThisOut@uiuc.edu> wrote:
:>Great for me, but I'm a Yankees fan. I hate the Mets, but just
:>because I root for the Yankees doesn't mean watching a baseball
:>closely isn't like strobe lights to an Episcopalian.
:
:Maybe if you cut back on the gin a bit you'd be able to appreciate it
:more.
That's a reason not to cut back on gin.
:
:--
:Milt Epstein
:mepstein@uiuc.edu
--
"It is always a simple matter to drag people along whether it is a
democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist
dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the
bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them
they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of
patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every
country."
-Hermann Goering
George W. Harris For actual email address, replace each 'u' with an 'i'. >> Stay informed about: GSD already? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 26, 2006 Posts: 128
|
(Msg. 30) Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:28 pm
Post subject: Re: GSD already? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"George W Harris" <gharrus.TakeThisOut@mundsprung.com> wrote
> :>Great for me, but I'm a Yankees fan. I hate the Mets, but just
> :>because I root for the Yankees doesn't mean watching a baseball
> :>closely isn't like strobe lights to an Episcopalian.
> :
> :Maybe if you cut back on the gin a bit you'd be able to appreciate it
> :more.
>
> That's a reason not to cut back on gin.
When you're drunk, you're drunk.
--Tedward >> Stay informed about: GSD already? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|