Hack-a-wallace sounds good to me... but only if that is becoming a
problem... the foul trouble scares me... what would we do without
Smith or Skinner in the fourth quarter...
If B. Wallace is tearing it up tonight early in the first, bring in
Godz, or even Santiago to hack him up, no free points... keep
switching them up to rack up the fouls... throw new guys, new speed at
this team... don't let them get used to our one-trick poney combo of
tony k & B knight...
Its obvious our biggest problem in Game 3 was lack of help off the
bench... if we had that, the 3'rd quarter would not have happened...
If terry stopped the play when he say the pistons on a run immediatly
& changed up the line up, maybe things would have been different...
One thing we have learned... you can't be up at the 1/2 by 10 & think
the game is over... these guys can rack up the points within a
minute...
europa2846.RemoveThis@aol.com (Europa2846) wrote in message news:<20040425201003.05832.00000022.RemoveThis@mb-m03.aol.com>...
> >From: r@cLIeNUX. (cLIeNUX user)
> >
> >humbubba@smart.net
> >> I'm not a big fan of the Hack-A-Shaq strategy because I'd rather see a
> team
> >>win because it clearly is the better team, but when you're down in a game or
> a
> >>series (or both), I don't think you should rule it out. And after watching
> Ben
> >>Wallace struggle at the FT line in Game 3, I'm thinking this strategy is
> >>something Porter might want to consider for the rest of this series.
> >> If a team has a particular weakness or a particular player has a weakness
> >>and that player is on the floor, and especially if he's logging big minutes
> as
> >>Shaq and Wallace do, then you can't argue with a coach trying to use every
> >>means at his disposal to gain an advantage. That's why I think it's
> something
> >>Porter should consider in Game 4 if things begin to slip away. It's probably
> >>something the Grizzlies should consider with Duncan in their series with the
> >>Spurs too.
> >> There aren't any style points for winning in the playoffs. All that
> matters
> >>is finding a way to win, which is why the Hack-A-Ben strategy is something
> >>Porter should at least consider - especially given how he has two big men
> (and
> >>three players total if you count Haislip) he's removed from the rotation
> >>anyway.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >The Bucks have a lot of things to do besides fouling. Getting fouled, for
> >one thing. Like, go inside once in a while. But it's too late.
> >
> >
> It's precarious, but hardly too late. If the Bucks win Game 4, this is a
> best-of-three series with both teams having proven they can beat the other on
> either team's court. If the Bucks lose Game 4, the series is over. >> Stay informed about: Should The Bucks Hack-A-Ben?