|
Next: good luck Georgetown!
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Mar 25, 2007
Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 4:31 pm
Post subject: Hansbrough not untouchable
Archived from groups: rec>sport>basketball>college (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Nov 08, 2003
Posts: 11
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 9:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Hansbrough not untouchable [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Bill Crapkin wrote:
> Georgetown beats Hansbrough 96-84. So much for Hansbrough's boasts
> about being invincible.
>
Double Double. Led all players in points. Led all players in rebounds
(tie). Made more free throws than the Georgetown TEAM. How about three
assists, and only one turnover.
Exactly what game were you watching, and with what sort of tinted
glasses? There were some vincible players out there, but their names
were Terry (4-13), Lawson (2-9), Ellington (2-11), and Green (0-6).
Hansbrough was a monster.
- Jason Bell |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 14, 2003
Posts: 11
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:37 am
Post subject: Re: Hansbrough not untouchable [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 16, 2007
Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 2:12 am
Post subject: Re: Hansbrough not untouchable [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Jason Bell" <Jason_Bell.RemoveThis@mail.com> wrote in message
news:46071e35$0$28105$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
>
> Bill Crapkin wrote:
>
>> Georgetown beats Hansbrough 96-84. So much for Hansbrough's boasts
>> about being invincible.
>>
>
> Double Double. Led all players in points. Led all players in rebounds
> (tie). Made more free throws than the Georgetown TEAM. How about three
> assists, and only one turnover.
>
> Exactly what game were you watching, and with what sort of tinted glasses?
> There were some vincible players out there, but their names were Terry
> (4-13), Lawson (2-9), Ellington (2-11), and Green (0-6).
>
> Hansbrough was a monster.
I agree that Hansbrough had a great game, although I wonder what his stats
were when Hibbert was in there. The guards for NC simply didn't provide
points down the stretch. Somebody other than Hansbrough needed to step up. >> Stay informed about: Hansbrough not untouchable |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 26, 2006
Posts: 128
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:23 am
Post subject: Re: Hansbrough not untouchable [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Joe" <skyking995.TakeThisOut@comcast.net> wrote
> Hansbrough didnt score when they needed it. He fouled when they didnt
> need it. Didnt do anything in the overtime.
That was Roy's fault. Wrong play calling and defensive sets.
--Tedward >> Stay informed about: Hansbrough not untouchable |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 08, 2003
Posts: 11
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Hansbrough not untouchable [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
> "Joe" <skyking995 RemoveThis @comcast.net> wrote
>
>
>>Hansbrough didnt score when they needed it. He fouled when they didnt
>>need it. Didnt do anything in the overtime.
>
>
> That was Roy's fault. Wrong play calling and defensive sets.
>
> --Tedward
I say we fire the bum.
- Jason Bell
(and pass the popcorn, Ted, thx) >> Stay informed about: Hansbrough not untouchable |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Feb 08, 2007
Posts: 49
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 7:56 pm
Post subject: Re: Hansbrough not untouchable [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Jason Bell wrote:
>
>
> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>
>> "Joe" <skyking995.TakeThisOut@comcast.net> wrote
>>
>>
>>> Hansbrough didnt score when they needed it. He fouled when they didnt
>>> need it. Didnt do anything in the overtime.
>>
>>
>>
>> That was Roy's fault. Wrong play calling and defensive sets.
>>
>> --Tedward
>
>
> I say we fire the bum.
>
> - Jason Bell
>
> (and pass the popcorn, Ted, thx)
>
Can we crucify him before firing? >> Stay informed about: Hansbrough not untouchable |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 26, 2006
Posts: 128
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 8:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Hansbrough not untouchable [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Charlie Board" <charNOTlieORTHISboard DeleteThis @nc.rr.com> wrote
> >> That was Roy's fault. Wrong play calling and defensive sets.
> >>
> >> --Tedward
> >
> >
> > I say we bon fire the bum.
> >
> > - Jason Bell
> >
> > (and pass the popcorn, Ted, thx)
>
> Can we crucify him before bon firing?
IFYPsFY, and sure, the cross will just be more fuel
on the fire.
--Tedward >> Stay informed about: Hansbrough not untouchable |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 12, 2003
Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Hansbrough not untouchable [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Jason Bell <Jason_Bell RemoveThis @mail.com> wrote:
> Bill Crapkin wrote:
> > Georgetown beats Hansbrough 96-84. So much for Hansbrough's boasts
> > about being invincible.
> Double Double. Led all players in points. Led all players in rebounds
> (tie). Made more free throws than the Georgetown TEAM. How about three
> assists, and only one turnover.
> Exactly what game were you watching, and with what sort of tinted
> glasses? There were some vincible players out there, but their names
> were Terry (4-13), Lawson (2-9), Ellington (2-11), and Green (0-6).
> Hansbrough was a monster.
I thought the point was that he was being left to beat them by himself,
and well, he's not *quite* that good.
Against a lesser team, maybe, but Georgetown is actually pretty good, so
he could have used a little help.
Michael >> Stay informed about: Hansbrough not untouchable |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 26, 2006
Posts: 128
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 12:39 pm
Post subject: Re: Hansbrough not untouchable [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Michael Sullivan" <mes.TakeThisOut@panix.com> wrote
> > > Georgetown beats Hansbrough 96-84. So much for Hansbrough's boasts
> > > about being invincible.
>
> > Double Double. Led all players in points. Led all players in rebounds
> > (tie). Made more free throws than the Georgetown TEAM. How about three
> > assists, and only one turnover.
>
> > Exactly what game were you watching, and with what sort of tinted
> > glasses? There were some vincible players out there, but their names
> > were Terry (4-13), Lawson (2-9), Ellington (2-11), and Green (0-6).
>
> > Hansbrough was a monster.
>
> I thought the point was that he was being left to beat them by himself,
> and well, he's not *quite* that good.
>
> Against a lesser team, maybe, but Georgetown is actually pretty good, so
> he could have used a little help.
Holding a team to 25 points isn't easy.
--Tedward >> Stay informed about: Hansbrough not untouchable |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
