Dan Gaters wrote:
> paddy_nyr:
>
>> Why not the Brooklyn Nets?
>
> How many NBA teams are named after boroughs?
There's no rule on what geographical area is used for team names (see
Warriors, Golden State). So why not Brooklyn, which has a very distinct
personality? It's also worth noting that with 2.5 million residents,
Brooklyn would be the 4th-largest city in the US, if it were still an
independent city.
And yes, I grew up in Brooklyn, so perhaps I'm biased.
>> But most likely the New York Nets.
>
> What's wrong with THE Nets? :-)
>
Would you have all of the other teams drop the locations from their names,
too?
=p=
>> Stay informed about: New Jersey Nets or New York Nets?