Malone to the Spurs?

On 23 Jul 2004 09:12:51 -0700, ambchang.DeleteThis@hotmail.com (Albert) wrote:

>> >> Congratulations, you can read.
>> >
>> >Apparently,
>>
>> I am glad you have reached that milestone in your life.
>> Now if you stop whining, you'd be on the right track of growing up.
>
>
>Go on

It seems that you are talking to yourself.
Almost everyone else moved on, except your sorry self still whining here
and unable to admit that he posted bullshit and got called on it.
Changing what you said will not make it different.
Get used to it.
 >> Stay informed about: Malone to the Spurs? 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: Malone to the Spurs? 

Sports Fan <sports.TakeThisOut@fan.home> wrote in message news:<v0q2g0pp7stg8do7otftui6ffe1klj8v2h.TakeThisOut@4ax.com>...
> On 23 Jul 2004 09:12:51 -0700, ambchang.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com (Albert) wrote:
>
> >> >> Congratulations, you can read.
> >> >
> >> >Apparently,
> >>
> >> I am glad you have reached that milestone in your life.
> >> Now if you stop whining, you'd be on the right track of growing up.
> >
> >
> >Go on
>
> It seems that you are talking to yourself.
> Almost everyone else moved on, except your sorry self still whining here
> and unable to admit that he posted bullshit and got called on it.
> Changing what you said will not make it different.
> Get used to it.

who is "everyone"? Was there a third party that was involved in this
post that I am not aware of? Or was that "everyone" just you? Now
Mr. everyone, stop dodging the question, put up or shut up:

"Sure, he [Karl Malone] is still a very good defensive post player in
the Spurs series, but do you need that against the Wallaces?" Explain
to me why this statement was totally irrelevant when you replied by
saying that Karl Malone was a strong defensive forces against Tim
Duncan as a retort to my original post.
Also, where is the explanation on how Malone on offense is affected
by the opposition's defense unclear?
 >> Stay informed about: Malone to the Spurs? 

In article <fe4ef4b6.0407260602.6e846bc8 RemoveThis @posting.google.com>
ambchang RemoveThis @hotmail.com (Albert) wrote:

>Continuing your infamous

Infamous according to you?
Sorry junior, you don't count.

Now stop whining and get a life.
 >> Stay informed about: Malone to the Spurs? 

Sports Fan <sports.RemoveThis@fan.home> wrote in message news:<n6mag01ebq6u9oaivtau11c30k9moi6ikp.RemoveThis@4ax.com>...
> In article <fe4ef4b6.0407260602.6e846bc8.RemoveThis@posting.google.com>
> ambchang.RemoveThis@hotmail.com (Albert) wrote:
>
> >Continuing your infamous
>
> Infamous according to you?
> Sorry junior, you don't count.
>
> Now stop whining and get a life.

Now I have yet to read one relevant retort on why Malone's
injury was relevant on the outcome of the series. So why is mine
bullshit. I have posted it numerous times that Malone was not
effective on an offense that was similar to the Pistons (the Spurs)
and that Malone's defense is would be of minimal effect because of the
Pistons offense.
Are you going to say anything relevant, or are you going to keep on
repeating the same few statements of irrelevancy over and over and
over and over again.
Come on, tell me why Malone would be a catalyst, or at least have
any sort of significant contributor to this series.

I have never had an easier time grilling another person on usernet,
cut and paste is all that's needed.
 >> Stay informed about: Malone to the Spurs? 

On 27 Jul 2004 09:54:47 -0700, ambchang.RemoveThis@hotmail.com (Albert) wrote:

>I have never had an easier time grilling another person on usernet,

You must be talking about yourself.
You are being trolled and laughed at across several newsgroups, but
you're too stupid to realize it.

One a side note, it is called USENET not usernet, dumbass.
 >> Stay informed about: Malone to the Spurs? 

On 27 Jul 2004 10:10:08 -0700, ambchang.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com (Albert) wrote:

>Although your facts were nothing close to real facts, this is an
>improvement. At least there is SOME sort of argument relating to Karl
>Malone.

Typical moron.
When faced with facts, they are now "nothing close to real facts", as
expected.
This is why I never take morons like you seriously.
Fact don't work with you, because you are not interested in facts, you
are interested in having the last word in the thread to satisfy your
oversized trolling ego.

I usually don't troll the trolls, but I find it funny how easy and
predictable you are.

I am enjoying the show, please don't stop, continue to make a complete
ass out of yourself.
 >> Stay informed about: Malone to the Spurs? 

Sports Fan <sports.DeleteThis@fan.home> wrote in message news:<j5rdg05g25grh69bdr1j6i5vbnio5e0fjv.DeleteThis@4ax.com>...
> On 27 Jul 2004 10:10:08 -0700, ambchang.DeleteThis@hotmail.com (Albert) wrote:
>
> >Although your facts were nothing close to real facts, this is an
> >improvement. At least there is SOME sort of argument relating to Karl
> >Malone.
>
> Typical moron.
> When faced with facts, they are now "nothing close to real facts", as
> expected.
> This is why I never take morons like you seriously.
> Fact don't work with you, because you are not interested in facts, you
> are interested in having the last word in the thread to satisfy your
> oversized trolling ego.
>

So Karl Malone scoring 20-30 points a game in the regular season when
healthy was a fact, when his season hi was 20 points, and he did it
only 4 times out of 42 games? Try finding one game last season in the
regular season where he scored more than 20 points, go ahead.


> I usually don't troll the trolls, but I find it funny how easy and
> predictable you are.
>
> I am enjoying the show, please don't stop, continue to make a complete
> ass out of yourself.


And that is given the fact that you still haven't answered the
following:

"Against the Spurs, when he was still healthy, he shot 44% from the
field, had double figure rebounds in 2 of the 6 games, averging 8 a
game, 3.2 assists, and 10 points. Now math genius, how can a person
score a double-double in every game when he only barely averaged
double figures in one category?
Sure, he played much better in the Rockets series, but he had 3 out of
5 games with double figure rebounds and no games with more than 5
assists again. Hardly "double-double or close to a triple-double in
almost every game".
As for the one triple double in the REGULAR season (and very early in
the regular season), that's 1 out of 42 games, hardly a norm."

BTW, how is "everybody" doing? Say hi to them for me.
 >> Stay informed about: Malone to the Spurs? 

Sports Fan <sports RemoveThis @fan.home> wrote in message news:<v1rdg092vh9agbl92ju2opkfmrecbqj82r RemoveThis @4ax.com>...
> On 27 Jul 2004 09:54:47 -0700, ambchang RemoveThis @hotmail.com (Albert) wrote:
>
> >I have never had an easier time grilling another person on usernet,
>
> You must be talking about yourself.
> You are being trolled and laughed at across several newsgroups, but
> you're too stupid to realize it.
>
> One a side note, it is called USENET not usernet, dumbass.

Oh yeah, I am sure I am being laughed across several newsgroups by "everyone".

So what is your reply to the following?
"Now I have yet to read one relevant retort on why Malone's
injury was relevant on the outcome of the series. So why is mine
bullshit. I have posted it numerous times that Malone was not
effective on an offense that was similar to the Pistons (the Spurs)
and that Malone's defense is would be of minimal effect because of the
Pistons offense.
Are you going to say anything relevant, or are you going to keep on
repeating the same few statements of irrelevancy over and over and
over and over again.
Come on, tell me why Malone would be a catalyst, or at least have
any sort of significant contributor to this series."
 >> Stay informed about: Malone to the Spurs? 

Sports Fan <sports.DeleteThis@fan.home> wrote in message news:<v1rdg092vh9agbl92ju2opkfmrecbqj82r.DeleteThis@4ax.com>...
> On 27 Jul 2004 09:54:47 -0700, ambchang.DeleteThis@hotmail.com (Albert) wrote:
>
> >I have never had an easier time grilling another person on usernet,
>
> You must be talking about yourself.
> You are being trolled and laughed at across several newsgroups, but
> you're too stupid to realize it.
>
> One a side note, it is called USENET not usernet, dumbass.

jajajaja usernet, USENET jajajajaja
Daaaaave
http://www.youwager.com
 >> Stay informed about: Malone to the Spurs? 

On 28 Jul 2004 07:49:23 -0700, ambchang DeleteThis @hotmail.com (Albert) wrote:

><As expected, nothing but whining>

I don't know what to do, laugh or feel sad when seeing you doing exactly
what I want you to do.

Please don't stop, I think I will choose to laugh, you're so easy and
predictable.
 >> Stay informed about: Malone to the Spurs? 

On 28 Jul 2004 07:58:35 -0700, ambchang.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com (Albert) wrote:

>> >I have never had an easier time grilling another person on usernet,
>>
>> You must be talking about yourself.
>> You are being trolled and laughed at across several newsgroups, but
>> you're too stupid to realize it.
>>
>> One a side note, it is called USENET not usernet, dumbass.
>
>Oh yeah, I am sure I am being laughed across several newsgroups by "everyone".

Glad you agree, Mr. usernet.

You could at least say thank you for the free education that you got.
 >> Stay informed about: Malone to the Spurs? 

Sports Fan <sports.DeleteThis@fan.home> wrote in message news:<giggg0l4d1f6tg7415rldn0s0r2528d85n.DeleteThis@4ax.com>...
> On 28 Jul 2004 07:58:35 -0700, ambchang.DeleteThis@hotmail.com (Albert) wrote:
>
> >> >I have never had an easier time grilling another person on usernet,
> >>
> >> You must be talking about yourself.
> >> You are being trolled and laughed at across several newsgroups, but
> >> you're too stupid to realize it.
> >>
> >> One a side note, it is called USENET not usernet, dumbass.
> >
> >Oh yeah, I am sure I am being laughed across several newsgroups by "everyone".
>
> Glad you agree, Mr. usernet.
>
> You could at least say thank you for the free education that you got.


Still couldn't get this right, eh?

"Now I have yet to read one relevant retort on why Malone's
injury was relevant on the outcome of the series. So why is mine
bullshit. I have posted it numerous times that Malone was not
effective on an offense that was similar to the Pistons (the Spurs)
and that Malone's defense is would be of minimal effect because of the
Pistons offense.
Are you going to say anything relevant, or are you going to keep on
repeating the same few statements of irrelevancy over and over and
over and over again.
Come on, tell me why Malone would be a catalyst, or at least have
any sort of significant contributor to this series."
 >> Stay informed about: Malone to the Spurs?