Grey Matters wrote:
> "Terraholm" <TerraholmSPAMNOT.DeleteThis@hotmail.com> wrote in
>
>> I am really looking forward to the blazers next season and
>> beyond...Roy is turning into a special player
>
> Hey, couldn't Portland use a point guard?
Roy is a PG. to save energy Blake brings the ball upthe 1st 3 quarters then
hands off the ball to Roy and he runs the plays.
And then I think you may see a Roy and Rudy backcourt in a year or two if
Rudy is near as good as hyped and he comes over. Blazers have even had Paul
Allen in Spain recruiting...
> Don't they need a veteran
> guy in the front court? How about trading Wallace and Billups for
> Oden and Roy?
Does not match salary...Not enough offense for ya either...better take "good
'sheed" LA too. =)
>We could throw in the Ambassador Bridge while we're at
> it.
A bridge would be good.... and lets see...Portland wants a major league
baseball team....
>
>> ...oden
>
> Any sense how he'll do this year? How he's going to be integrated
> into the lineup?
Poor Nate what will a small ball coach do?
Oden likely starts right off the bat with Joel moving to the bench.
My guess is they run a ton of pick and rolls and with his defense get to run
more too.
Oden being out a year helped develop Outlaw and Aldridge ("good 'sheed") and
with the better record Oden will not have the pressure of 'savoir'.
>
>> and rudy
>> Fernandez incoming, the core role players improving... Another
>> lottery pick to use or trade on a record that would have been 6th
>> seed in the east... and in a year they can also go on the FA market
>> as they will be perhaps 2 max contracts under the cap. So my guess
>> is that lackluster record of Nates will be improving... =)
>>
>> I thought this was interesting...what coaches do best in plays
>> following time outs?
>> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120846936079424371.html?mod=googlenews_
>> wsj
>
> It's interesting,
Most interesting is that it was a wall street journal article...
>but I think some of that isn't so valuable on a one
> season basis. The close games winning %, for example, would probably
> vary a lot from year to year since it seems to generally be only a
> handful of games and would swing a lot on just a couple of lucky
> bounces.
Actually come to think about it I remember it as Portland had a good record
there the pevious season too, on games decided by 3 pts or less... hmmm.
found it ...11-6 ...so 11 out of 32 wins came in close games. ... Detroit
was 6-10 last year.
Coaching and winning for nate was an even bigger challenge last
year....Every starter was out injured and at times so was their backups that
had moved into the start...by the end of the season their starting center
was some BWS from OZ on a 10 day contract.
I will prefer next year the blazers have a winning record for games won by
10+
--
Laurel T
"I thought Bill Laimbeer was the whiniest, most
despicable, most disgusting guy in the game.
On the other hand, I always
respected him as a player." Barkley
>> Stay informed about: Michael Curry to be next Pistons coach...