Rasho is the man

I've said it before, and I'll say it again - he's the closest thing to
Oak this team has:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/basketball/nba/viewcast/2008/03/09/in....html?c

Anyone who thinks Rasho doesn't contribute is an idiot. And I often
think Mitchell doesn't use Rasho enough. So he's an idiot too!

--
OK

On Mar 10, 2:00 pm, "Onion Knight" <dioneo(at)hotmail.com> wrote:
> I've said it before, and I'll say it again - he's the closest thing to
> Oak this team has:
>
> http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/basketball/nba/viewcast/2008/03/09/i...
>
> Anyone who thinks Rasho doesn't contribute is an idiot. And I often
> think Mitchell doesn't use Rasho enough. So he's an idiot too!
>
> --
> OK

Who cares about Oak? It's not like we have a superstar who needs to
be nudged every once in awhile. A decade later, nobody cares about
this. Time to move on man.. stop living in the past.

Rasho's been great. Defensively he makes a big difference when we
face teams who have a Bigs-focused offense. Just because he only
recently put up good stats doesn't mean he hasn't been great all year
for us though. There is only 1 thing that bugs me about Rasho and you
can blame San Antonio for it -- he's making way too much money.