Shaq to Sacto?

"Nenad Gavrilovic" <nenad-g.DeleteThis@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:4kiCc.466156$Ar.222984@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> I sincerely hope not. Personally, I just don't think Shaq's the guy the
> Kings are looking for. Maybe I'm completely wrong, though. :-\
>

Not even to get a championship?

> "Peter L" <peterl68.DeleteThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2jto87F15umndU1@uni-berlin.de...
> > Well, first of all, the Lakers are not likely to trade Shaq to any team
in
> > the west. But speculation runs rampant when supposedly Shaq said in
Vegas
> > not to be surprised to find him playing for the Kings next year.
> >
> > So, are you willing to sell your soul for a championship?
> >
> >
> > --
> > OK
> >
> >
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Shaq to Sacto? 

Nenad Gavrilovic wrote:

> I sincerely hope not. Personally, I just don't think Shaq's the guy the
> Kings are looking for. Maybe I'm completely wrong, though. :-\

I disagree. I think he would fit into the Kings offense, and provide a
much needed rebounding and shot blocking presence. He would not help the
Kings whining mentality though...


>
> "Peter L" <peterl68.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2jto87F15umndU1@uni-berlin.de...
>
>>Well, first of all, the Lakers are not likely to trade Shaq to any team in
>>the west. But speculation runs rampant when supposedly Shaq said in Vegas
>>not to be surprised to find him playing for the Kings next year.
>>
>>So, are you willing to sell your soul for a championship?
>>

Why, yes... yes I am.


Eric
 >> Stay informed about: Shaq to Sacto? 

Damn it, Eric --rebounding and shot blocking doesn't win games. Haha. J/k. I
think Shaq's offense would be the biggest contribution, followed by his
rebounding. It's just that Shaq is more of the guy that'll take his own shot
rather than pass it off like Miller and especially Divac. Divac is pretty
much the glue for the Kings, and when he leaves we (and by 'we', I mean the
Kings) will need a center that can take over that part, not just the
rebounding and what-not. Of course, if the Kings did land Shaq I wouldn't go
around protesting. :-P


"Eric" <gokings.RemoveThis@volcano.net> wrote in message
news:10dji021t2edt1d@corp.supernews.com...
> Nenad Gavrilovic wrote:
>
> > I sincerely hope not. Personally, I just don't think Shaq's the guy the
> > Kings are looking for. Maybe I'm completely wrong, though. :-\
>
> I disagree. I think he would fit into the Kings offense, and provide a
> much needed rebounding and shot blocking presence. He would not help the
> Kings whining mentality though...
>
>
> >
> > "Peter L" <peterl68.RemoveThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:2jto87F15umndU1@uni-berlin.de...
> >
> >>Well, first of all, the Lakers are not likely to trade Shaq to any team
in
> >>the west. But speculation runs rampant when supposedly Shaq said in
Vegas
> >>not to be surprised to find him playing for the Kings next year.
> >>
> >>So, are you willing to sell your soul for a championship?
> >>
>
> Why, yes... yes I am.
>
>
> Eric
 >> Stay informed about: Shaq to Sacto? 

"Nenad Gavrilovic" <nenad-g RemoveThis @rogers.com> wrote in message
news:eMoCc.472576$Ar.129223@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> Damn it, Eric --rebounding and shot blocking doesn't win games. Haha. J/k.
I
> think Shaq's offense would be the biggest contribution, followed by his
> rebounding. It's just that Shaq is more of the guy that'll take his own
shot
> rather than pass it off like Miller and especially Divac. Divac is pretty
> much the glue for the Kings, and when he leaves we (and by 'we', I mean
the
> Kings) will need a center that can take over that part, not just the
> rebounding and what-not. Of course, if the Kings did land Shaq I wouldn't
go
> around protesting. :-P

Me neither, and it will be the ultimate slap in the face of the Lackers
owner. That might be enough to motivate him to go to Sacramento.

NC
 >> Stay informed about: Shaq to Sacto? 

I was wondering when sombody would mention the "S" word here.


"Nenad Gavrilovic" <nenad-g RemoveThis @rogers.com> wrote in message
news:eMoCc.472576$Ar.129223@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> Damn it, Eric --rebounding and shot blocking doesn't win games. Haha. J/k.
I
> think Shaq's offense would be the biggest contribution, followed by his
> rebounding. It's just that Shaq is more of the guy that'll take his own
shot
> rather than pass it off like Miller and especially Divac. Divac is pretty
> much the glue for the Kings, and when he leaves we (and by 'we', I mean
the
> Kings) will need a center that can take over that part, not just the
> rebounding and what-not. Of course, if the Kings did land Shaq I wouldn't
go
> around protesting. :-P
>
>
> "Eric" <gokings RemoveThis @volcano.net> wrote in message
> news:10dji021t2edt1d@corp.supernews.com...
> > Nenad Gavrilovic wrote:
> >
> > > I sincerely hope not. Personally, I just don't think Shaq's the guy
the
> > > Kings are looking for. Maybe I'm completely wrong, though. :-\
> >
> > I disagree. I think he would fit into the Kings offense, and provide a
> > much needed rebounding and shot blocking presence. He would not help the
> > Kings whining mentality though...
> >
> >
> > >
> > > "Peter L" <peterl68 RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:2jto87F15umndU1@uni-berlin.de...
> > >
> > >>Well, first of all, the Lakers are not likely to trade Shaq to any
team
> in
> > >>the west. But speculation runs rampant when supposedly Shaq said in
> Vegas
> > >>not to be surprised to find him playing for the Kings next year.
> > >>
> > >>So, are you willing to sell your soul for a championship?
> > >>
> >
> > Why, yes... yes I am.
> >
> >
> > Eric
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Shaq to Sacto? 

"Nic Caciappo" <nicbeat.TakeThisOut@mlode.com> wrote in message
news:10dkqgp6mudtmfd@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Nenad Gavrilovic" <nenad-g.TakeThisOut@rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:eMoCc.472576$Ar.129223@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> > Damn it, Eric --rebounding and shot blocking doesn't win games. Haha.
J/k.
> I
> > think Shaq's offense would be the biggest contribution, followed by his
> > rebounding. It's just that Shaq is more of the guy that'll take his own
> shot
> > rather than pass it off like Miller and especially Divac. Divac is
pretty
> > much the glue for the Kings, and when he leaves we (and by 'we', I mean
> the
> > Kings) will need a center that can take over that part, not just the
> > rebounding and what-not. Of course, if the Kings did land Shaq I
wouldn't
> go
> > around protesting. :-P
>
> Me neither, and it will be the ultimate slap in the face of the Lackers
> owner. That might be enough to motivate him to go to Sacramento.
>

Shaq can't just "go" to any team. He still has one year remaining on his
contract. If he gets traded to Sacto he'll be the laughing stock of LA. If
you think Webber bad mouthing Sacto was bad, wait till Shaq and his goons
roll into town.



> NC
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Shaq to Sacto?