"#1KingsFan" <markm62NOSPAM.DeleteThis@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:xdkXd.13148$OU1.1550@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
>
> As I recall, the Laker's management basically let Shaq know that they were
> going with Kobe and were not going to pay Shaq. But, would paying him
> massive dollars and trading Kobe have been such a bad thing?
When you consider Shaq's continued decline because of aging, coupled with
his propensity to NOT report to the Lakers in shape, which would no doubt be
enhanced by signing a final massive extension, yes, it would have been a bad
thing.
Greg
>> Stay informed about: Suck it up, be a man!