 |
|
|
|
Next: New York Knicks: More Marbury buyout stuff...
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Jun 23, 2005
Posts: 726
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:40 pm
Post subject: Trade with GS
Archived from groups: alt>sports>basketball>pro>ny-knicks (more info?)
|
|
|
Barring GS makes a trade for a starting PG, does this trade make sense?
Zach Randolph and Nate Robinson for Al Harrington, Brandon Wright, and CJ
Watson.
The main players in the deal are the Knicks players and Harrington and
Wright, Watson just evens out the salaries.
GS gets a pretty good rebounder and post player in Randolph, and a PG to
replace Davis for a season or possibly Ellis if he goes to another team.We
get Harrington who probably fits D's system better than Randolph. Not sure
if Randolph really fits in with GS and Don Nelsons wide open style, but they
still have Nellie's fav in Jackson to run with and Nate would do well in a
system like GS's. Nate also seems to be maturing a bit IMO over his rookie
season (well he couldn't be more of a baby, that's for sure).
I know a lot of stuff would have to not happen trade wise for GS to even
consider this, but this may be a last option if nothing else works for
Mullin.
We could also replace Nate with Lee which would be more favorable to GS and
give them a F who would compliment Jackson. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Jun 23, 2005
Posts: 726
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: Trade with GS [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Glenn Greenstein" <glen.jackson RemoveThis @worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:R6Kck.204864$SV4.2437@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Barring GS makes a trade for a starting PG, does this trade make sense?
> Zach Randolph and Nate Robinson for Al Harrington, Brandon Wright, and CJ
> Watson.
> The main players in the deal are the Knicks players and Harrington and
> Wright, Watson just evens out the salaries.
> GS gets a pretty good rebounder and post player in Randolph, and a PG to
> replace Davis for a season or possibly Ellis if he goes to another team.We
> get Harrington who probably fits D's system better than Randolph. Not sure
> if Randolph really fits in with GS and Don Nelsons wide open style, but
> they still have Nellie's fav in Jackson to run with and Nate would do well
> in a system like GS's. Nate also seems to be maturing a bit IMO over his
> rookie season (well he couldn't be more of a baby, that's for sure).
> I know a lot of stuff would have to not happen trade wise for GS to even
> consider this, but this may be a last option if nothing else works for
> Mullin.
> We could also replace Nate with Lee which would be more favorable to GS
> and give them a F who would compliment Jackson.
>
Sorry, GS would need to add Belinelli to make the trade work salaries wise.
I think that would kill the deal as GS has very little team left if they
value Belinelli. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 17, 2008
Posts: 34
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:43 pm
Post subject: Re: Trade with GS [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:43:01 GMT, "Glenn Greenstein"
<glen.jackson.RemoveThis@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>"Glenn Greenstein" <glen.jackson.RemoveThis@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
>news:R6Kck.204864$SV4.2437@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
>> Barring GS makes a trade for a starting PG, does this trade make sense?
>> Zach Randolph and Nate Robinson for Al Harrington, Brandon Wright, and CJ
>> Watson.
>> The main players in the deal are the Knicks players and Harrington and
>> Wright, Watson just evens out the salaries.
>> GS gets a pretty good rebounder and post player in Randolph, and a PG to
>> replace Davis for a season or possibly Ellis if he goes to another team.We
>> get Harrington who probably fits D's system better than Randolph. Not sure
>> if Randolph really fits in with GS and Don Nelsons wide open style, but
>> they still have Nellie's fav in Jackson to run with and Nate would do well
>> in a system like GS's. Nate also seems to be maturing a bit IMO over his
>> rookie season (well he couldn't be more of a baby, that's for sure).
>> I know a lot of stuff would have to not happen trade wise for GS to even
>> consider this, but this may be a last option if nothing else works for
>> Mullin.
>> We could also replace Nate with Lee which would be more favorable to GS
>> and give them a F who would compliment Jackson.
>>
>Sorry, GS would need to add Belinelli to make the trade work salaries wise.
>I think that would kill the deal as GS has very little team left if they
>value Belinelli.
>
Well, GS can always offer their 2nd round pick, that will solve the
salary problem. >> Stay informed about: Trade with GS |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 10, 2008
Posts: 7
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 1:16 am
Post subject: Re: Trade with GS [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 8 Lug, 15:40, "Glenn Greenstein" <glen.jack....DeleteThis@worldnet.att.net>
wrote:
> Zach Randolph and Nate Robinson
I think Nate is not the kind of PG Nelson likes. Maybe Collins is more
similar to Baron Davis?
Big PG with playmaking instinct. Zach does not fit Nelson's run'n gun
style. It has to be seen if they have any interest in him.
> for Al Harrington, Brandon Wright, and CJ
> Watson.
Wright is simply too valuable to be included.The others may be ok.
Maybe a sign&trade with Pietrus/Barnes? >> Stay informed about: Trade with GS |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 361
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:30 am
Post subject: Re: Trade with GS [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jul 8, 9:40 am, "Glenn Greenstein" <glen.jack....RemoveThis@worldnet.att.net>
wrote:
> Barring GS makes a trade for a starting PG, does this trade make sense?
> Zach Randolph and Nate Robinson for Al Harrington, Brandon Wright, and CJ
> Watson.
No chance:
1. Mullin is too smart to take Randolph's contract;
2. Randolph's too slow to play in Nellie's system, even if #1 was
wrong;
3. GS has no use for Robinson with Ellis on board;
4. No way Mullin would give up two valuable players (Harrington and
Wright) for two essentially worthless players. Even if Harrington
doesn't fit with GS any more, he's still got more value to the rest of
the league than THAT.
> GS gets a pretty good rebounder and post player in Randolph,
Already got Biedrins, who's a better one.
> and a PG to
> replace Davis for a season or possibly Ellis if he goes to another team.
Nate is no PG. Otherwise we'd have used him ourselves.
> We could also replace Nate with Lee which would be more favorable to GS and
> give them a F who would compliment Jackson.
That's a little bit more sensible, but right now GS is going to be
looking for PGs. Lee and Biendrins have almost the same game, anyway
(and Biedrins is better). >> Stay informed about: Trade with GS |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 361
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 11:32 am
Post subject: Re: Trade with GS [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jul 9, 4:16 am, Ugo <usirt....RemoveThis@yahoo.it> wrote:
> Maybe Collins is more
> similar to Baron Davis?
Just like Jerome James is similar to Patrick Ewing in his prime.
> Wright is simply too valuable to be included.The others may be ok.
> Maybe a sign&trade with Pietrus/Barnes?
Neither Pietrus nor Barnes are still on GS's roster. >> Stay informed about: Trade with GS |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 23, 2005
Posts: 726
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:13 pm
Post subject: Re: Trade with GS [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Ugo" <usirtori.RemoveThis@yahoo.it> wrote in message
news:9c4b5974-c574-4ace-96d9-37905bde26f2@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On 8 Lug, 15:40, "Glenn Greenstein" <glen.jack....RemoveThis@worldnet.att.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Zach Randolph and Nate Robinson
>
> I think Nate is not the kind of PG Nelson likes. Maybe Collins is more
> similar to Baron Davis?
> Big PG with playmaking instinct. Zach does not fit Nelson's run'n gun
> style. It has to be seen if they have any interest in him.
>
>> for Al Harrington, Brandon Wright, and CJ
>> Watson.
>
> Wright is simply too valuable to be included.The others may be ok.
> Maybe a sign&trade with Pietrus/Barnes?
Not sure if Pietrus and Barnes can be traded. They were not selectable on
RealGM's trade checker. >> Stay informed about: Trade with GS |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 10, 2008
Posts: 7
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 12:44 am
Post subject: Re: Trade with GS [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 9 Lug, 20:32, Noah <dontsendmeyers....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Maybe Collins is more
> > similar to Baron Davis?
> Just like Jerome James is similar to Patrick Ewing in his prime.
Of course, but I meant the KIND of player, not the value.
> > Wright is simply too valuable to be included.The others may be ok.
> > Maybe a sign&trade with Pietrus/Barnes?
> Neither Pietrus nor Barnes are still on GS's roster.
I know they are UFA, but GS must have their Bird right, so they can
sign&trade them to facilitate a trade scenario. >> Stay informed about: Trade with GS |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 361
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 7:24 am
Post subject: Re: Trade with GS [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jul 10, 3:44 am, Ugo <usirt....DeleteThis@yahoo.it> wrote:
> I know they are UFA, but GS must have their Bird right, so they can
> sign&trade them to facilitate a trade scenario.
No. Barnes was let go last year, and Pietrus just signed with
Orlando. >> Stay informed about: Trade with GS |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in/Register/Password
