Terraholm wrote:
> Charles Beauchamp wrote:
>
>>Terraholm wrote:
>>
>>>Charles Beauchamp wrote:
<snipping entertaining debate between Laurel and Beau>
>>out that he left a potential title contender for the draft lottery.
>
>
> I think the sonics will be short of a true contender but you are certainly
> right in the basic idea. Perhaps he did not figure the sonics would acheive
> above expectations or live up to the new ones.
I agree here. I don't think the Sonics will be a true title contender,
and they may very well have taken a half-step back even had McMillan
returned. Not only will the Sonics likely lose at least one contributor
to free agency (Radmanovic, James, and Daniels are all possibilities or
probabilities), but they got career years out of a bunch of guys last
season and some unreal chemistry. I think they'll need to re-adjust a
little this off-season before really hitting their stride and hopefully
being true contenders for several seasons after this next year.
And really, getting a new coach and a new voice in might not be a bad
thing for that process.
>
He knows he is going to a
> rebuilding team that may take awhile to get to the playoffs, just perhaps he
> can overacheive with them too, because I think they are not as bad or as far
> from making the playoffs as you are making out....
I'll definitely be paying even closer attention to the Blazers next
year, that's for sure. Even beyond the Nate and Martell angle, I love
watching the development of talented young players, and the Blazers
definitely have a few there. And I really like watching Zach Randolph
play - on the offensive end, anyway.
Cheers,
Chris Hafner
>> Stay informed about: This is the challenge awaiting Nate in Portland