 |
|
 |
|
Next: New clothes
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Jun 11, 2004 Posts: 1082
|
(Msg. 31) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:03 am
Post subject: Re: Admiration for Shaq... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: alt>sports>basketball>nba>boston-celtics, others (more info?)
|
|
|
"MMM" <madmanmoon05 DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote in message
news:c82e3255-e24b-45f2-958e-1965061b6838@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>
>I said the Lakers defense was adequate..that doesn't mean top 15..
WHAT? If they don't rate in th top HALF of the league, that makes them
INADEQUATE!
>it means they were good enough when it mattered.
4 games to 2 says...hmmmm....what's the word I'm looking for? Oh, it's
"NOT!!!!!" >> Stay informed about: Admiration for Shaq... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 20, 2006 Posts: 788
|
(Msg. 32) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 12:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Admiration for Shaq... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
durrell.RemoveThis@innocence.com (Bryant Durrell) wrote in
news:0oydnVJsN9sMwfnVnZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d@supernews.com:
> In article <Xns9AC9C10967012dewey3kNOSPAMgmailco.RemoveThis@130.133.1.4>,
> theBZA <dewey3kNOSPAM.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>durrell@innocence.com (Bryant Durrell) wrote in
>>news:EsydnY3p9dEcZ_7VnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@supernews.com:
>>
>>> In article
>>> <58f1b332-f7b4-46ec-843a-3d79497db16c.RemoveThis@i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>>> <lakerswin2009.RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>smeltics said that for 20+ years and then they changed it to "three
>>>>players away" and imported three mercenaries to buy a title.
>>>
>>> Bitter!
>>
>>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sports.basketball.nba.boston-
celtics
>>/msg/06db3e20938ccb46?dmode=source
>
> /Really/ bitter!
>
You can me all the names you want. Doesn't change the fact that you
surrendered your principles the very second they became inconvenient.
It's sad that of all the Celtics fans who posted in asbnll or in the
cross-posted threads, you were really the only one who seemed to have
something to offer and now all you can do is call names and run like
hell from your own beliefs. That's pathetic.
--
Are you Evolved? >> Stay informed about: Admiration for Shaq... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 20, 2006 Posts: 788
|
(Msg. 33) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 12:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Admiration for Shaq... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
HS <h.shivanan DeleteThis @gmail.com> wrote in news:afab7a2a-299d-46fd-ac2a-
9edeb342823f DeleteThis @u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com:
> On Jun 27, 8:20 am, durr... DeleteThis @innocence.com (Bryant Durrell) wrote:
>> /Really/ bitter!
>>
> So are you saying the Celts didn't rely on hired guns?
> Or are you saying he's bitter for bothering to bring this (valid)
> point up at all?
>
I didn't even bring it up. I just reposted his own words.
--
Are you Evolved? >> Stay informed about: Admiration for Shaq... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 20, 2006 Posts: 788
|
(Msg. 34) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 12:52 pm
Post subject: Re: Admiration for Shaq... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
durrell RemoveThis @innocence.com (Bryant Durrell) wrote in
news:0oydnU1sN9uNwPnVnZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d@supernews.com:
> In article <5lV8k.2456$%q.1574@newsfe24.lga>, VicXnews
> <news RemoveThis @news.com> wrote:
>>durrell@innocence.com (Bryant Durrell) wrote in
>>news:EsydnY3p9dEcZ_7VnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@supernews.com:
>>
>>> In article
>>> <58f1b332-f7b4-46ec-843a-3d79497db16c RemoveThis @i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>>> <lakerswin2009 RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>smeltics said that for 20+ years and then they changed it to "three
>>>>players away" and imported three mercenaries to buy a title.
>>>
>>> Bitter!
>>
>>truth hurt?
>
> Does losing sting?
>
You've had 24 years to answer that one.
--
Are you Evolved? >> Stay informed about: Admiration for Shaq... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 30, 2004 Posts: 1230
|
(Msg. 35) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:01 pm
Post subject: Re: Admiration for Shaq... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"MMM" <madmanmoon05.TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in message
news:a4053fc2-5a7e-48d9-87b7-c3fa085fb029@l28g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 26, 9:32?pm, "Skeptic" <bcs0....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "MMM" <madmanmoo....TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c82e3255-e24b-45f2-958e-1965061b6838@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 26, 8:39?am, "Skeptic" <bcs0....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "MMM" <madmanmoo....TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:e292cf82-7c8f-420e-b874-89db1d675174@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> > On Jun 26, 7:24?am, "Skeptic" <bcs0....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > "MMM" <madmanmoo....TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:1ee94f9d-7a0c-47a7-8b5f-d23116b5c0f1@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > > On Jun 26, 5:37?am, "Skeptic" <bcs0....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > "MMM" <madmanmoo....TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> > > >news:9523fcbe-2819-4a78-9d00-557a5ae57560@y22g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> > > > On Jun 25, 6:50?pm, "Ego" <d....TakeThisOut@d.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > did he make this up impromptu?
>
> > > > > that's awsome... he's very talented!!!
>
> > > > Like Kobe needs any more inspiration to win another ring..but on
> > > > behalf of all Laker fans..Thanks Shaq!
>
> > > > *********************************************
>
> > > > He needs a lot more than inspiration. ?Most players have that
> > > > already.
> > > > ?He
> > > > could start with a better team.
>
> > > One player away..and for damn sure it isn't Shaq. Maybe that one
> > > player is Bynum. Lakers this season with a 4 dedicated to collecting
> > > offensive boards win the championship...I just don't see Gasol or Odom
> > > filling that role but I also don't think the lakers will have the
> > > exact same roster next season.
>
> > > ********************************************
>
> > > lol ... "one player away".... lots of teams say that. ?If they have
> > > the
> > > same
> > > roster next year they're going to be in trouble. ?They need to get
> > > something
> > > resembling a defense and between bad coaching and poor defensively
> > > skilled
> > > players, they didn't have anything of the sort. ?No defense = no more
> > > rings
> > > for Kobe.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > The Lakers defense was adequate enough this season, just not very
> > consistant. It's all about the rebounds and especially on the
> > offensive end. Find me a team that has won a championship in the past
> > 20-30 years that didn't have a well above average 4 in regards to
> > collecting O. rebounds...
>
> > ****************************************************
>
> > Lakers defense was in the bottom half. ?It was woeful. ?It really showed
> > how
> > bad it was in game 6. ?Or is that a repressed memory? ?I'm not saying
> > you
> > don't have a rebounding problem also. ?Seems like you have a lot of
> > holes
> > to
> > fill. ?Funny how those were the exact holes (along with many others)
> > that
> > Shaq had filled.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> I said the Lakers defense was adequate..that doesn't mean top 15..it
> means they were good enough when it mattered.
>
> ********************************************************
>
> That is indeed what you said. ?It just isn't accurate - at all.- Hide
> quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
From this I am to take that your belief is if the Lakers were a better
defensive team they would have won the championship.
***********************************************************
Well that would be a rather silly conclusion, huh? I simply disagreed the
Lakers D was "good enough". It sucked. Plain and simple. They were a bad
defensive during the season - before and after Gasol, and during the
playoffs. Those are just the facts. >> Stay informed about: Admiration for Shaq... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 30, 2004 Posts: 1230
|
(Msg. 36) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Admiration for Shaq... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"theBZA" <dewey3kNOSPAM.DeleteThis@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9ACA5A48AE3B1dewey3kNOSPAMgmailco@130.133.1.4...
> durrell.DeleteThis@innocence.com (Bryant Durrell) wrote in
> news:0oydnU1sN9uNwPnVnZ2dnUVZ_jmdnZ2d@supernews.com:
>
>> In article <5lV8k.2456$%q.1574@newsfe24.lga>, VicXnews
>> <news.DeleteThis@news.com> wrote:
>>>durrell@innocence.com (Bryant Durrell) wrote in
>>>news:EsydnY3p9dEcZ_7VnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@supernews.com:
>>>
>>>> In article
>>>> <58f1b332-f7b4-46ec-843a-3d79497db16c.DeleteThis@i36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>>>> <lakerswin2009.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>smeltics said that for 20+ years and then they changed it to "three
>>>>>players away" and imported three mercenaries to buy a title.
>>>>
>>>> Bitter!
>>>
>>>truth hurt?
>>
>> Does losing sting?
>>
> You've had 24 years to answer that one.
The whole "you're too caught up in the past" gig is sort of, well, in the
past. >> Stay informed about: Admiration for Shaq... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 30, 2004 Posts: 1230
|
(Msg. 37) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 4:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Admiration for Shaq... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Robert Chin" <bchin_us.RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:g42s070ij8@news4.newsguy.com...
> "MMM" <madmanmoon05.RemoveThis@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:c82e3255-e24b-45f2-958e-1965061b6838@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>I said the Lakers defense was adequate..that doesn't mean top 15..
>
> WHAT? If they don't rate in th top HALF of the league, that makes them
> INADEQUATE!
>
>>it means they were good enough when it mattered.
>
> 4 games to 2 says...hmmmm....what's the word I'm looking for? Oh, it's
> "NOT!!!!!"
Yeah, apparently game 6 didn't "matter"... lol >> Stay informed about: Admiration for Shaq... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 20, 2006 Posts: 788
|
(Msg. 38) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Admiration for Shaq... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
durrell.RemoveThis@innocence.com (Bryant Durrell) wrote in
news:fdadneUx4ZV2dPnVnZ2dnUVZ_qHinZ2d@supernews.com:
> In article
> <afab7a2a-299d-46fd-ac2a-9edeb342823f.RemoveThis@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com>,
> HS <h.shivanan.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Jun 27, 8:20 am, durr....RemoveThis@innocence.com (Bryant Durrell) wrote:
>>> /Really/ bitter!
>>>
>>So are you saying the Celts didn't rely on hired guns?
>>Or are you saying he's bitter for bothering to bring this (valid)
>>point up at all?
>
> I'm talkin' 'bout BITTER.
>
It's all you can talk about since anything else forces you to face your own
hypocrisy.
--
Are you Evolved? >> Stay informed about: Admiration for Shaq... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Aug 20, 2006 Posts: 788
|
(Msg. 39) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:15 pm
Post subject: Re: Admiration for Shaq... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
HS <h.shivanan.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> wrote in news:1e8bd839-bcd3-43a9-830e-
3aea4c602a1c.TakeThisOut@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com:
> Bryant Durrell wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm talkin' 'bout BITTER.
> heh. Your refusal to answer this question is noted. :)
> And yes, I am bitter.
>
Bryant is bitter too. He is deeply bitter that I threw his own words in his
face. So all he can do now is call me names. It's all he has left.
--
Are you Evolved? >> Stay informed about: Admiration for Shaq... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 11, 2004 Posts: 1082
|
(Msg. 40) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:15 pm
Post subject: Re: Admiration for Shaq... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"theBZA" <dewey3kNOSPAM RemoveThis @gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9ACA9B2E4BB94dewey3kNOSPAMgmailco@130.133.1.4...
>
> Bryant is bitter too. He is deeply bitter that I threw his own words in
> his
> face. So all he can do now is call me names. It's all he has left.
You're f'ing nuts. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA!!!!
IT'S THE LA FANS WHO REFUSE TO ACCEPT REALITY AND CONTINUE TO CLING TO THE
FANTASY THAT KOBE IS THE BEST PLAYER IN THE GAME AND THE LA FRAUDS HAD A
CHANCE AGAINST THE CELTICS!!!! YOU GUYS ARE PATHETIC!!! >> Stay informed about: Admiration for Shaq... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 04, 2007 Posts: 111
|
(Msg. 41) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 8:36 pm
Post subject: Re: Admiration for Shaq... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jun 25, 9:53Â pm, MMM <madmanmoo... DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote:
> On Jun 25, 6:50�pm, "Ego" <d... DeleteThis @d.com> wrote:
>
> > did he make this up impromptu?
>
> > that's awsome... he's very talented!!!
>
> Like Kobe needs any more inspiration to win another ring..but on
> behalf of all Laker fans..Thanks Shaq!
Apparently he does, according to this http://tinyurl.com/3zquey
LOL! >> Stay informed about: Admiration for Shaq... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 08, 2008 Posts: 67
|
(Msg. 42) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:23 pm
Post subject: Re: Admiration for Shaq... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jun 27, 7:03�am, "Robert Chin" <bchin....TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "MMM" <madmanmoo....TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c82e3255-e24b-45f2-958e-1965061b6838@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> >I said the Lakers defense was adequate..that doesn't mean top 15..
>
> WHAT? �If they don't rate in th top HALF of the league, that makes them
> INADEQUATE!
>
> >it means they were good enough when it mattered.
>
> 4 games to 2 says...hmmmm....what's the word I'm looking for? �Oh, it's
> "NOT!!!!!"
Stupid comments like this just shows you are not capable of paying
attention. You missed the point entirely but thanks for giving it a go
anyways. >> Stay informed about: Admiration for Shaq... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 04, 2007 Posts: 111
|
(Msg. 43) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:44 pm
Post subject: Re: Admiration for Shaq... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jun 28, 12:20Â am, VicXnews <n....RemoveThis@news.com> wrote:
> Ron <BigELil....RemoveThis@msn.com> wrote in news:13f22fe0-0e74-4ba7-916d-6bdc8118344a@
> 34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:
>
> > On Jun 25, 9:53Â pm, MMM <madmanmoo....RemoveThis@aol.com> wrote:
> >> On Jun 25, 6:50�pm, "Ego" <d....RemoveThis@d.com> wrote:
>
> >> > did he make this up impromptu?
>
> >> > that's awsome... he's very talented!!!
>
> >> Like Kobe needs any more inspiration to win another ring..but on
> >> behalf of all Laker fans..Thanks Shaq!
>
> > Apparently he does, according to this http://tinyurl.com/3zquey
>
> > LOL!
>
> quoting someones opinion from the usenet...nice source...
Oh, you mean just like MMM's "opinion" that Kobe doesn't need anymore
"inspiration to win another ring"? >> Stay informed about: Admiration for Shaq... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 08, 2008 Posts: 67
|
(Msg. 44) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Admiration for Shaq... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jun 27, 9:01�am, "Skeptic" <bcs0... DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
> "MMM" <madmanmoo... DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:a4053fc2-5a7e-48d9-87b7-c3fa085fb029@l28g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 26, 9:32?pm, "Skeptic" <bcs0... DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "MMM" <madmanmoo... DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:c82e3255-e24b-45f2-958e-1965061b6838@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> > On Jun 26, 8:39?am, "Skeptic" <bcs0... DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > "MMM" <madmanmoo... DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:e292cf82-7c8f-420e-b874-89db1d675174@w1g2000prd.googlegroups.com....
> > > On Jun 26, 7:24?am, "Skeptic" <bcs0... DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > "MMM" <madmanmoo... DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote in message
>
> > > >news:1ee94f9d-7a0c-47a7-8b5f-d23116b5c0f1@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > > > On Jun 26, 5:37?am, "Skeptic" <bcs0... DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > "MMM" <madmanmoo... DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote in message
>
> > > > >news:9523fcbe-2819-4a78-9d00-557a5ae57560@y22g2000prd.googlegroups..com...
> > > > > On Jun 25, 6:50?pm, "Ego" <d... DeleteThis @d.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > did he make this up impromptu?
>
> > > > > > that's awsome... he's very talented!!!
>
> > > > > Like Kobe needs any more inspiration to win another ring..but on
> > > > > behalf of all Laker fans..Thanks Shaq!
>
> > > > > *********************************************
>
> > > > > He needs a lot more than inspiration. ?Most players have that
> > > > > already.
> > > > > ?He
> > > > > could start with a better team.
>
> > > > One player away..and for damn sure it isn't Shaq. Maybe that one
> > > > player is Bynum. Lakers this season with a 4 dedicated to collecting
> > > > offensive boards win the championship...I just don't see Gasol or Odom
> > > > filling that role but I also don't think the lakers will have the
> > > > exact same roster next season.
>
> > > > ********************************************
>
> > > > lol ... "one player away".... lots of teams say that. ?If they have
> > > > the
> > > > same
> > > > roster next year they're going to be in trouble. ?They need to get
> > > > something
> > > > resembling a defense and between bad coaching and poor defensively
> > > > skilled
> > > > players, they didn't have anything of the sort. ?No defense = no more
> > > > rings
> > > > for Kobe.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > The Lakers defense was adequate enough this season, just not very
> > > consistant. It's all about the rebounds and especially on the
> > > offensive end. Find me a team that has won a championship in the past
> > > 20-30 years that didn't have a well above average 4 in regards to
> > > collecting O. rebounds...
>
> > > ****************************************************
>
> > > Lakers defense was in the bottom half. ?It was woeful. ?It really showed
> > > how
> > > bad it was in game 6. ?Or is that a repressed memory? ?I'm not saying
> > > you
> > > don't have a rebounding problem also. ?Seems like you have a lot of
> > > holes
> > > to
> > > fill. ?Funny how those were the exact holes (along with many others)
> > > that
> > > Shaq had filled.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > I said the Lakers defense was adequate..that doesn't mean top 15..it
> > means they were good enough when it mattered.
>
> > ********************************************************
>
> > That is indeed what you said. ?It just isn't accurate - at all.- Hide
> > quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> From this I am to take that your belief is if the Lakers were a better
> defensive team they would have won the championship.
>
> ***********************************************************
>
> Well that would be a rather silly conclusion, huh? �I simply disagreed the
> Lakers D was "good enough". �It sucked. �Plain and simple.. �They were a bad
> defensive during the season - before and after Gasol, and during the
> playoffs. �Those are just the facts.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
I'm beginning to lose faith in C-Trolls. Ok, plain and simple you
state the Lakers defense "sucked". Lakers beat Celtics
twice..gasp..how did that happen? Did they score like 1000 points or
something because their defense sure must of been sucking those games
too? My point and again..sigh..having to explain the obvious was that
the Lakers defense should have been good enough to at least be
competitive if not beat the Celtics in this series. Defense was NOT
the main reason the Lakers lost the series. Your blow out game
six..remember...? 14-2 I bet you know what those numbers are.
Offensive rebounds..that's right..and guess how many the Lakers had in
the first half...? 0! while shooting something like in the 20%
range..I'm not drawing pictures so once again..cya. >> Stay informed about: Admiration for Shaq... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 04, 2007 Posts: 111
|
(Msg. 45) Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 10:21 pm
Post subject: Re: Admiration for Shaq... [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Jun 28, 12:47Â am, VicXnews <n... RemoveThis @news.com> wrote:
> Ron <BigELil... RemoveThis @msn.com> wrote in news:2bc111bb-1777-4e87-ae5f-dc9c59c20d54
> @k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 28, 12:20Â am, VicXnews <n... RemoveThis @news.com> wrote:
> >> Ron <BigELil... RemoveThis @msn.com> wrote in news:13f22fe0-0e74-4ba7-916d-
> 6bdc811834
> > 4a@
> >> 34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> > On Jun 25, 9:53Â pm, MMM <madmanmoo... RemoveThis @aol.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Jun 25, 6:50�pm, "Ego" <d... RemoveThis @d.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> > did he make this up impromptu?
>
> >> >> > that's awsome... he's very talented!!!
>
> >> >> Like Kobe needs any more inspiration to win another ring..but on
> >> >> behalf of all Laker fans..Thanks Shaq!
>
> >> > Apparently he does, according to thishttp://tinyurl.com/3zquey
>
> >> > LOL!
>
> >> quoting someones opinion from the usenet...nice source...
>
> > Oh, you mean just like MMM's "opinion" that Kobe doesn't need anymore
> > "inspiration to win another ring"?
>
> write a book and send me a signed copy...
No problem, I always give my bitches free stuff. >> Stay informed about: Admiration for Shaq... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|