paucity of hoop news from wolves

S. Smith wrote:
> On 3 Aug 2006 20:05:06 -0700, "levi" <levi.DeleteThis@visi.com> wrote:
>
> >ikrushlots@aol.com wrote:
> >> Andy H wrote:
> >> > S. Smith wrote:
> >> > > On 1 Aug 2006 12:30:38 -0700, "Andy H" <aharcus.DeleteThis@msn.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >I makes you wonder
> >> > >
> >> > > Yes, you often make me wonder, Andy. ;-)
> >> > >
> >> > What? Ikrush thinks we out smoked the Wallace signing. Now that is
> >> > blotter acid seeing things on the sunny side.
> >>
> >> I've always felt Wallace is overrated.
> >
> >For years now, I thought it was Krush who opined that Big Ben
> >was a "defensive MONSTER", but no, that was Scott in 2002.
>
> Did I really say defensive "monster"? ;)

As I quoted you - CAPITALIZED. <wink>

>
> Oh well, compared to any big man the Wolves have *ever* had, I
> still think that statement is fairly accurate.
>
> >It was Krush (in the same thread, btw) who thought Hudson was
> >an upgrade from Billups, in fact stating "it's obvious he will never
> >be even a very good point guard". Arguable at the time perhaps.
> >Laughable now ( <chuckle> ).
>
> LOL
>
> Yeah, that Billups...what a bum he has turned out to be. ;)
>
> For the record, I was really upset when the Wolves let him
> slip away. I think Krush was the only one happy to see him go.
>
> >Ben Wallace would be a HUGE upgrade at center for the Wolves,
> >despite the perceived lack of offense.
>
> No doubt about it.
>
>
>
>
> - Scott Smith: scott.DeleteThis@sludgereport.org
> Books Blog: http://scottsbooks.blogspot.com
> Blue States Rising: http://www.bluestaterising.blogspot.com

On 3 Aug 2006 20:05:06 -0700, "levi" <levi.TakeThisOut@visi.com> wrote:

>ikrushlots@aol.com wrote:
>> Andy H wrote:
>> > S. Smith wrote:
>> > > On 1 Aug 2006 12:30:38 -0700, "Andy H" <aharcus.TakeThisOut@msn.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >I makes you wonder
>> > >
>> > > Yes, you often make me wonder, Andy. ;-)
>> > >
>> > What? Ikrush thinks we out smoked the Wallace signing. Now that is
>> > blotter acid seeing things on the sunny side.
>>
>> I've always felt Wallace is overrated.
>
>For years now, I thought it was Krush who opined that Big Ben
>was a "defensive MONSTER", but no, that was Scott in 2002.

Did I really say defensive "monster"? ;)

Oh well, compared to any big man the Wolves have *ever* had, I
still think that statement is fairly accurate.

>It was Krush (in the same thread, btw) who thought Hudson was
>an upgrade from Billups, in fact stating "it's obvious he will never
>be even a very good point guard". Arguable at the time perhaps.
>Laughable now ( <chuckle> ).

LOL

Yeah, that Billups...what a bum he has turned out to be. ;)

For the record, I was really upset when the Wolves let him
slip away. I think Krush was the only one happy to see him go.

>Ben Wallace would be a HUGE upgrade at center for the Wolves,
>despite the perceived lack of offense.

No doubt about it.




- Scott Smith: scott.TakeThisOut@sludgereport.org
Books Blog: http://scottsbooks.blogspot.com
Blue States Rising: http://www.bluestaterising.blogspot.com