wow..did LaMarcus piss on Nate's donuts or something?

Terraholm wrote:
> Blazer Fan Dan wrote:
> > why the hell is Jamaal still in the game? The team is down by almost
> > 30 and Jamaal is doing nothing.
>
> He comes in and outscores both Jamal and Rafe with one shot....

makes you wonder sometimes, don't it? I'm not against Nate, but
sometimes his subbing makes me think he learned from the Maurice Cheeks
school of subbing.
 >> Stay informed about: wow..did LaMarcus piss on Nate's donuts or something? 

On 26 Dec 2006 22:58:59 -0800, "Blazer Fan Dan"
<BlazerFanDan.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>Terraholm wrote:
>> Blazer Fan Dan wrote:
>> > why the hell is Jamaal still in the game? The team is down by almost
>> > 30 and Jamaal is doing nothing.
>>
>> He comes in and outscores both Jamal and Rafe with one shot....
>
>makes you wonder sometimes, don't it? I'm not against Nate, but
>sometimes his subbing makes me think he learned from the Maurice Cheeks
>school of subbing.

or the mike dunleavy school....or the pj carlisemo school....or the
mike shuler school....

adelman was about the only blazer coach that gave consistent time to
any rookies...and not much at that

Nate appears to be bugged by defensive lapses....which a rookie is
prone too.... more then any other brainfart they do. And aldridge has
blown a lot of defensive rotations. Of course, a lot of blazers have

Magloire has been dominant on the boards lately so I can understand
his playing time. I haven't seen much from lafrentz though....aldridge
has had about 7 games better then lafrentz's best.

Nate has a tendancy to give players....especially veterans... about a
10 game stretch to prove themselves, so I'm guessing if lafrentz
doesn't start contributing, aldridge will move ahead of him in a few
games
 >> Stay informed about: wow..did LaMarcus piss on Nate's donuts or something?